refactor(openclaw): remove REST facade (port 8004), unify on WebSocket

Remove the redundant OpenClaw REST service (port 8004) since frontend
already uses WebSocket via Gateway (port 8765) → OpenClaw (port 18789).

Deleted:
- backend/apps/openclaw_service.py
- backend/api/openclaw.py
- backend/tests/test_openclaw_service_app.py
- backend/tests/test_service_clients.py
- shared/client/openclaw_client.py

Updated:
- backend/apps/__init__.py — remove openclaw_app exports
- backend/api/__init__.py — remove openclaw_router
- shared/client/__init__.py — remove OpenClawServiceClient
- backend/services/gateway_openclaw_handlers.py — update docstring
- start.sh — remove port 8004 service startup

Architecture:
- Before: Frontend → HTTP :8004 → subprocess openclaw CLI
- After: Frontend → WS :8765 → Gateway → WS :18789 → OpenClaw

Constraint: Frontend already uses WebSocket exclusively
Confidence: high
Scope-risk: low (frontend unchanged)
This commit is contained in:
2026-04-02 11:04:06 +08:00
parent 45c3996434
commit ecc7623093
10 changed files with 4 additions and 1625 deletions

View File

@@ -5,8 +5,6 @@ from .agent_service import app as agent_app
from .agent_service import create_app as create_agent_app
from .news_service import app as news_app
from .news_service import create_app as create_news_app
from .openclaw_service import app as openclaw_app
from .openclaw_service import create_app as create_openclaw_app
from .runtime_service import app as runtime_app
from .runtime_service import create_app as create_runtime_app
from .trading_service import app as trading_app
@@ -23,8 +21,6 @@ __all__ = [
"create_agent_app",
"news_app",
"create_news_app",
"openclaw_app",
"create_openclaw_app",
"runtime_app",
"create_runtime_app",
"trading_app",

View File

@@ -1,65 +0,0 @@
# -*- coding: utf-8 -*-
"""Read-only OpenClaw CLI FastAPI surface.
COMPATIBILITY_SURFACE: deferred
OWNER: runtime-team
SEE: docs/legacy-inventory.md#openclaw-dual-integration
This is the REST facade (port 8004) for OpenClaw integration.
For the WebSocket gateway integration, see:
- backend/services/gateway_openclaw_handlers.py
- shared/client/openclaw_websocket_client.py
Key differences:
- REST facade: typed Pydantic models, request/response, polling
- WebSocket: event-driven, real-time updates, bidirectional
Decision needed: which surface becomes the long-term contract?
"""
from __future__ import annotations
from fastapi import Depends, FastAPI
from backend.api import openclaw_router
from backend.apps.cors import add_cors_middleware
from backend.api.openclaw import get_openclaw_cli_service
def create_app() -> FastAPI:
"""Create the OpenClaw service app."""
app = FastAPI(
title="大时代 OpenClaw Service",
description="Read-only OpenClaw CLI integration service surface",
version="0.1.0",
)
add_cors_middleware(app)
@app.get("/health")
async def health_check(
service=Depends(get_openclaw_cli_service),
) -> dict[str, object]:
return service.health()
@app.get("/api/status")
async def api_status(
service=Depends(get_openclaw_cli_service),
) -> dict[str, object]:
return {
"status": "operational",
"service": "openclaw-service",
"openclaw": service.health(),
}
app.include_router(openclaw_router)
return app
app = create_app()
if __name__ == "__main__":
import uvicorn
uvicorn.run(app, host="0.0.0.0", port=8004)